ℹ️ Informational only. This site aggregates public news and does not provide legal or immigration advice. Always verify with USCIS.gov or travel.state.gov. Full disclaimer →

StatusWire
← Back to feed
General U.S. NewsOct 31, 2026·2 min read

Legal filing questions Trump’s claims of non-citizen voting in California

A

Al Jazeera – News

aljazeera.com
3d ago
Legal filing questions Trump’s claims of non-citizen voting in California

Summary

A new court filing has cast further doubt on the accuracy of a list of “likely non-citizen” voters that the administration of United States President Donald Trump sent to the state of California ahead of the midterm elections. On Saturday, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), an advocacy group, submitted an analysis to the court conducted by two data scientists from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). It found that more than four in every 10 names on the list were not on California’s voter rolls. It also found that thousands of potentially eligible US citizens were incorrectly identified as ineligible to vote. The Trump administration’s list, delivered to California in early October, had suggested that as many as 20,930 “likely non-citizens” were registered on the state’s voter rolls. That list has formed the basis of a lawsuit, filed on October 15, that calls on California to sequester any ballots sent to those “likely non-citizens”, preventing them from being tallied as part of voting results. The lawsuit is unfolding in the final days before Tuesday’s pivotal midterm elections, which will decide which party controls the US Congress, as well as key state and local offices. Trump has expressed fear that, if his Republican Party loses its majorities in the two chambers of Congress, he could be impeached. The Republican leader also has a track record of spreading false information about elections, including that his defeat in the 2020 presidential race was the result of a “rigged” vote. Under the US Constitution’s Elections Clause, election administration falls solely to the states, though Congress may pass regulations governing voting.

From the source

Data scientists find that many 'likely non-citizens' identified by the Trump administration were erroneously flagged.

Read the full article

Published by Al Jazeera – News on aljazeera.com

Open on aljazeera.com ↗
Advertisement

More in General U.S. News

Madras High Court Advocates Association challenges 1965 Union Cabinet decision to continue English as common language for Supreme Court and all High Courts
General U.S. News3d ago

Madras High Court Advocates Association challenges 1965 Union Cabinet decision to continue English as common language for Supreme Court and all High Courts

Subscribed with another email? Unlock these with Subscription Published - November 01, 2026 02:27 am IST - CHENNAI MHAA has contended that the bar imposed on use of regional languages in High Courts violates Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (freedom of speech and expression) and 21 (right to life) of the Constitution. | Photo Credit: FILE PHOTO The Madras High Court Advocates Association (MHAA) has filed a public interest litigation petition in the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of an Union Cabinet Committee’s 1965 decision that English should continue as the common language for the Supreme Court and all High Courts in the country until it could be replaced with Hindi. MHAA said, a conference of Chief Justices of all High Courts in the country was held in the first week of March 1965 under the chairmanship of the then Chief Justice of India (CJI) P.B. The CJI’s letter to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) stated that the conference had recommended that the Supreme Court and all High Courts should have a common language, English should continue to be such common language “until in due course Hindi becomes rich and ripe enough to take its place” and that regional languages should not be introduced as languages of High Courts. Subsequently, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) put up a note before the Cabinet Committee, constituted to consider different aspects of regional language policy, on May 17, 1965. The note read that there would be difficulty in elevating High Court judges to the Supreme Court and also in the appearance of lawyers before various High Courts and the Supreme Court if there was no common language for these courts. “One of the major unifying factors in the country is a unified judicial system with a common language and uniform way of functioning in High Courts. There can be little doubt that if regional languages were permitted to be used in the High Courts, we would be moving towards fragmentation of the judicial system, and it would not be possible to maintain for long the unitary character of the judicial system with the Supreme Court at the apex. An all-India bar of any sort cannot also continue to exist,” the note read. The MHA said, the Cabinet may accept the recommendation of the Chief Justices’ conference that the Supreme Court and all the High Courts in the country should have a common language and that English should continue to be used until Hindi could take its place. Venkatesan, too has filed a separate PIL petition seeking a declaration that the litigants have a right to file pleadings, advance oral arguments and receive judgements, orders and decrees in a language they understand.

What is ranked-choice voting and how does it work in US elections?
General U.S. News3d ago

What is ranked-choice voting and how does it work in US elections?

In Alaska, a controversy is unfolding over whether two Senate candidates with roughly the same name will cancel each other out. The debate has shone a spotlight on a relatively uncommon style of voting in the United States: a system known as “ranked choice”. Only two states in the United States — Alaska and Maine — employ ranked-choice voting throughout their territory, though major cities like New York have also embraced the practice. Ranked-choice ballots allow voters to rank candidates in order of preference, rather than choosing just one. If a voter’s first choice does not win a majority, their vote can be transferred to their second pick. With US midterm elections set for November 3, ranked-choice voting could play a role in closely watched races, including the Alaska Senate battle. Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system could come under scrutiny in this year’s Senate race, where two candidates named Dan Sullivan appear on the ballot. In June, the Alaska Supreme Court allowed the vote to proceed with the participation of both Sullivans. But the controversy has prompted US President Donald Trump to sue Alaska , seeking to block certification of the Senate election results if the incumbent Dan S Sullivan loses. Earlier this year, Virginia approved legislation expanding the use of ranked-choice voting.

Centrist Democrats Would Rather Lose the Senate Than Win With El-Sayed
General U.S. News3d ago

Centrist Democrats Would Rather Lose the Senate Than Win With El-Sayed

Eoin Higgins is the author of “Owned: How Tech Billionaires on the Right Bought the Loudest Voice on the Left.” Halloween weekend is the last chance for centrist Democrats to stop the nightmare they fear most: Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed, who could be the first Muslim in the Senate. Rather than take the win, Haley Stevens, the House member who lost to El-Sayed in Michigan’s Democratic primary for Senate in August, used that condemnation on Friday as a springboard for a scathing denouncement of her former opponent, framed as a “celebration” of her magnanimous decision to campaign for El-Sayed this weekend alongside Rep. It’s not his rather anodyne liberalism in domestic policy — his policy portfolio isn’t far from that of party stalwart Elizabeth Warren — but El-Sayed’s opposition to Israel’s genocide of Palestinians that’s the issue. Senate polling from The New York Times/Siena University this week showed South Carolina in a dead heat — an absolute shocker — with Minnesota comfortably in the Democratic corner. With a Senate majority on the horizon, centrists need to enforce discipline and regain control. If Democrats can win the Senate without him, it would be all the better. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on Thursday called opposition to Israel’s existence as an apartheid ethnostate “more than concerning, it’s wrong,” on Donny Deutsch’s podcast, adding, “This new person in Michigan, we’ll see if he gets elected to the Congress.” On CNN Wednesday, New Jersey Sen. By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . In a statement released Friday evening, the candidate said he is intent on fighting for affordability, defeating the GOP, and making sure the Senate seat stays blue. With a Senate majority on the horizon, centrists will look to enforce discipline and regain control. “That should be the priority for all of us right now,” El-Sayed wrote. “So while Congresswoman Stevens seems intent on relitigating a primary that ended three months ago, let’s all focus on the task at hand: that’s beating Mike Rogers, holding Trump accountable, and getting money out of politics, putting money in pockets, and passing Medicare for All.” Washing his hands of the wrecker behavior Stevens is engaging in at the final stretch of the campaign is a smart mo