ℹ️ Informational only. This site aggregates public news and does not provide legal or immigration advice. Always verify with USCIS.gov or travel.state.gov. Full disclaimer →
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz instructed the Israeli military on July 28 to take control of another Palestinian refugee camp in the West Bank without identifying which one. He has said the operation should follow the “Tulkarem, Nur Shams and Jenin model.” Those words indicate more expulsion of Palestinians from their homes and so more potential ethnic cleansing and war crimes . The Israeli army expelled the residents of Tulkarem, Nur Shams, and Jenin refugee camps in January and February 2025 during Operation Iron Wall, a brutal, and sometimes lethal, operation by the military that resulted in the largest mass displacement of Palestinians in the West Bank since 1967. Katz said the displacement would last one year. But twenty months later, according to the United Nations, more than 33,000 Palestinian refugees remain displaced from the homes in the refugee camps they were living in two years ago. The Israeli military continues to forbid all access to the camps, denying these refugees the right to return to their homes. Scattered across the West Bank, the refugees are forced to rent accommodations, stay with relatives, or seek temporary housing from charitable organizations. Not only have the camps been emptied but the Israeli military has also systematically demolished residential homes and buildings to make way for a new network of widened roads and access ways, purportedly for “ military necessity .” Human Rights Watch found in November 2025 that these acts of forced displacement amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity . Through our investigation of Operation Iron Wall, Human Rights Watch identified senior officials who should be investigated and appropriately prosecuted for these war crimes and crimes against humanity , including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz. Despite the wealth of evidence amassed, Israeli authorities have neither investigated their military's abusive conduct nor have concerned foreign governments imposed any consequences for the atrocities committed.
Assembled automatically from 7 independent reports — every line below is a real sentence from a real source, not generated text. Numbers link to where each point came from.
Israeli raid deepens fears across West Bank refugee camps Israeli forces expanded their military operations in the occupied West Bank, carrying out a new raid on a refugee camp as journalists reported growing restrictions and violence.[1]
Staff were detained, tear gas and stun grenades were fired, and a fire broke out.[2]
Through our investigation of Operation Iron Wall, Human Rights Watch identified senior officials who should be investigated and appropriately prosecuted for these war crimes and crimes against humanity , including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz.[3]
Israeli raid deepens fears across West Bank refugee camps Israeli forces expanded their military operations in the occupied West Bank, carrying out a new raid on a refugee camp as journalists reported growing restrictions and violence.
Israeli raid deepens fears across West Bank refugee camps Israeli forces expanded their military operations in the occupied West Bank, carrying out a new raid on a refugee camp as journalists reported growing restrictions and violence.
Through our investigation of Operation Iron Wall, Human Rights Watch identified senior officials who should be investigated and appropriately prosecuted for these war crimes and crimes against humanity , including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz.
A plan put forward by Britain’s right-wing Reform UK party to deploy the navy to intercept and return asylum seekers arriving by boat has triggered a dispute with France. Reform leader Nigel Farage, who is under political pressure at home over a series of financial scandals and faces a by-election in just more than a week, characterised the mission dubbed “Operation Fortress” not as pushbacks but as “rescue and return”. He argued that, per its humanitarian nature, the measure would not breach international law, as stated by the French Ministry of the Interior. Pointing to the arrival of thousands of migrants in Spain’s North African enclave of Ceuta, Farage on Monday pledged, if elected, to stop a similar “invasion” by launching the largest military operation in the English Channel since World War II. He said the measure would ensure that people are “immediately returned to their point of departure”. Responding to France, Reform said: “We will always stand up for British interests and protect our people, whether [President] Emmanuel Macron likes it or not.” Zia Yusuf, Reform UK’s spokesperson for home affairs, claimed France “sent us 200,000 illegal migrants, including murderers and terrorists”, and that marines would return them anyway to the French coast. Sarah Singer, professor of refugee law at the University of London, described the plan as a “complete waste of military resources”. While returning asylum seekers could be read as an “act of aggression” by France, it would also run counter to international law, said Singer. “Summary expulsions are contrary to UK and European law, which requires those seeking protection to have their cases individually assessed to determine if they can safely be removed,” the lecturer told Al Jazeera. Sarah Wolff, professor in international studies and global politics at Leiden University, noted that while military boats had worked in the past – the Italian Navy mission Mare Nostrum that operated between 2013 and 2014, which had medical facilities on board, was said to have saved tens of thousands of lives and allowed for asylum applications to be processed in Italy – Reform UK’s scheme would instead “return migrants back to France and not take any responsibility for processing asylum applications”, making it equivalent to a pushback. Before exiting the European Union in 2020, the UK had been able to return asylum seekers to the country of first entry under the Dublin Convention, which established the rule of first entry to avoid multiple asylum claims. “Now, it has no means to return them back to an EU country,” Wolff told Al Jazeera. “So it is a bit ironic that (Reform UK, then known as the Brexit Party) which campaigned at the time to ‘gain back control’ is now offering solution to a post-Brexit migration situation it contributed to create.”
As home affairs minister’s National Press Club address is postponed, refugee advocates lament missed ‘opportunity to bring Australians together’ Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast Labor will introduce new rules to cut net overseas migration and push temporary residents to leave Australia, despite a major speech on the subject by the home affairs minister, Tony Burke , being delayed. But government sources told Guardian Australia the policy changes would not push net overseas migration lower than the existing target of 295,000 people this financial year. The ABC reported on Wednesday that Burke’s National Press Club address, originally scheduled for this week, had been postponed amid political considerations inside the Albanese government. The rescheduling will allow the prime minister, Anthony Albanese , to help sell any changes as Labor seeks to push back on criticism of its record by One Nation and the Coalition. The rule changes may not reduce net overseas migration (Nom) below the existing target, but could better prioritise parts of the system to tighten working holiday rules and family visa applications, or limit some appeal rights for overseas migrants. Labor’s indicative primary vote ticked up one point to 31% in July, while the Coalition’s share of the vote dropped further, down another point to 22%. Labor has kept the permanent migration target steady at 185,000 people for the 2025-26 financial year, in line with 2024-25, but the rules are getting tougher. International students wanting to undertake postgraduate study will be required to pay $5,750 for a visa, a rise of 25%, and the second in just four months. The energy minister, Chris Bowen, declined to discuss cabinet’s plans on Wednesday. “There’s always a balance to be struck, which is something our political opponents don’t often remember,” he said. “A lot of businesses rely on a very well-calibrated immigration system to provide the workers that, frankly, are difficult for the domestic market to supply.” Asylum Seeker Resource Centre deputy chief executive Jana Favero warned the government against demonising migrants to win back support from Pauline Hanson. “The planned National Press Club address should have been an opportunity to bring Australians together, not to legitimise the politics of fear and division,” she said. “Scapegoating migrants won’t build a home, lower a grocery bill or help a family pay the rent. Australia deserves better than politicians looking for someone to blame instead of delivering real solutions.” Shadow home affairs minister, Jonno Duniam, said Labor had caused “more chaos and confusion” by delaying the speech. “It is clearly only thinking about acting now because the political pressure has become impossible to ignore,” he said.
