Legal challenge to Australia's social media ban to start in High Court

Australian teen Noah Jones is no longer a plaintiff in the case but will attend Tuesday's hearing Two days of hearings on a challenge to Australia's landmark social media ban for children will begin at the country's highest court on Tuesday. In a major test of the world-leading policy, a digital rights group will argue that the ban for under-16s robs children of their right to free communication. A separate challenge launched by platform Reddit will be jointly heard. Introduced last December, the ban is a key part of sweeping changes the Australian government has spearheaded in recent years on online safety. Supporters say the ban protects children from harmful content but critics say it is too blunt an instrument and efforts should focus on improving online safety. The constitutional challenge in Australia's High Court was filed by the Digital Freedom Project a few weeks before the ban started on 10 December last year. The group is lead by New South Wales parliamentarian John Ruddick. Two teens who originally spearheaded the case , Noah Jones and Macy Neyland, have since withdrawn as plaintiffs though Jones is still expected to attend Tuesday's hearing. Speaking about the legal challenge last November, Jones told the BBC that there were bad things online but a blanket ban for under-16s was not the right answer. "They should be using this money and resources to try to get rid of the predators and harmful content out there." Reddit also launched a High Court challenge to the ban, arguing the policy has serious implications for privacy and political rights.